Your estate is multi-vendor by design. Your tooling shouldn't be. adapt collects from every array, fabric switch, host and cloud account you run — agentlessly, into one data model — and runs entirely inside your own estate.
No agents on your arrays. No data leaves your network. Runs air-gapped.
Running Dell, Hitachi, IBM and NetApp is sound procurement. Running four consoles that disagree with each other is what makes the estate expensive to operate.
An application is slow. Finding out whether it's the array, the fabric or the host takes three tools that don't share a clock.
Capacity forecasts mean exporting from each vendor console monthly and reconciling by hand. They're stale before they're finished.
Attributing consumption to a business unit needs one model across vendors. Without it, storage is a central cost with no owner.
Every tool needs someone who knows it. Qualified storage engineers are scarce and getting scarcer.
Licensed independently. Start with inventory and capacity, add the rest without redeploying anything. Every module ships a dashboard, a report catalogue and its own settings.
Nothing is installed on your arrays. Collection runs over each vendor's management API, with per-platform rate limiting so a collector never degrades the array it's watching.
Customer-hosted on-premises or in your private cloud. No vendor control plane. No outbound internet dependency.
mTLS between sites and server, SSO through SAML or OIDC, role-based access scoped per module and per site, and a full audit trail.
Adding forty more sites is adding forty containers. A 40-site reference estate needs roughly 24 server nodes.
The pipeline adds under two seconds end to end. What sets the rest is the array's own management API — and no vendor will tolerate one-second polling across every volume.
| Data class | How it arrives | Freshness |
|---|---|---|
| Alerts, SNMP traps, syslog | Pushed by the device | Under 2 seconds |
| Headline performance counters | Polled every 30 seconds | Under 32 seconds |
| Full performance statistics | Polled every 5 minutes | Under 5 minutes |
| Capacity and pool state | Polled every 15 minutes | Under 15 minutes |
| Configuration metadata | Polled every 8 hours, plus on change | Under 8 hours |
Anything that needs a human to act arrives in under two seconds, because faults are pushed by the device rather than discovered by polling. Everything else feeds trends and forecasts, where thirty-second freshness is already beyond what the decision requires.
We'd rather you test this claim than be impressed by it.A walkthrough takes forty minutes. Bring your array list and we'll tell you honestly what we can collect from it today and what we can't.
